Sen. Schumer: Vote no on GOP spending bill cloture

 Open Letter to Sen. Chuck Schumer, 

Dear Sen. Schumer, I beg you to change your mind. I have never been as disappointed and angry with a Democratic Party leader as I am with you and your intention to vote in favor of the GOP spending bill.  That’s saying a lot because I am 75 years old and have worked with the Party since 1966 as a teenager to register voters. I have marched, rallied, protested, testified, voted, phone banked, canvassed, and donated. I have done my job as a citizen. It’s time for you to do yours. 

Your job in the Senate is to advance the Democratic Party’s values expressed in our platform, a grassroots-up document.  We are FRUSTRATED that our elected officials do not seem to care that Trump, Musk and the GOP are ripping our country to shreds. All you do is ring your hands and whine. I see no evidence of a plan. Grow a spine! Be outraged! Care more for us than for re-election (of yourself and other Democrats.) Why is there no sense of urgency? Why do you not take every opportunity to counter what Trump is doing? Why are you not building on what is happening in the streets? Do you not understand that there will be no midterm elections if you don’t use every possible tool to fight back?  From what I can tell, only Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, AOC and couple of others seem to understand that this is going to be over in 3-6 months. 

Do you not understand that the GOP spending bill is the fuel to drive Project 2025? If you vote for this bill you are signing onto that project, those values. You will be helping to destroy the United States of America. That sir would make you a coward, and worse. 

And a little child shall lead them

With the stroke of a pen last week, a frazzled sense of decency and in the spirit of compromise, President Biden might have signed modern democracy’s death warrant. The bill that sent more military aid to Israel is a fuse likely to ignite a firestorm from the toxic atmosphere of incomprehensible violence and hate, greed and power that envelops the Earth.

It’s all horribly reminiscent of 1968, but with major, intensifying factors. Hundreds of millions more weapons of war are on the streets and mostly in the hands of those who support “military” solutions to America’s complex problems. A giant Far Right has conditioned them to believe that winning is everything. It excuses the most undemocratic, unpatriotic and abhorrent behavior. The leader of the Republican party has endorsed the most heinous acts using the language of thugs and mobsters. 

We’ve shriveled the Constitution’s commitment to form a “more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, … secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” into power grabs and infotainment. An impotent press and corporate interest-driven media leave us with the shallowest notion of truth. We have no common vision, experience or even facts.

             The crux of the debate most visibly centered on college campuses is the eons long conflicts perpetrated by Arabs, Jews and Christians in modern day Israel and Palestine.

              The current crisis began with a brutal, surprise attack by Hamas on Israel Oct. 7, 2023. Hamas killed 1,200 people and kidnapped another 250. In response, Israel launched a murderous air and land attack on Gaza and blocked humanitarian aid from reaching millions of civilians trapped there. So far 34,300 Gazans, 17,000 of them children, have died either from Israeli bombing, starvation or untreated medical issues. That’s out of a population of 2.1 million, mostly packed into an area about twice the size of D.C. Israel plans another attack on Gaza that targets Rafah, where the world has established a safe haven for more than a million refugee victims of the war. The United States has provided tens of billions of dollars in military aid to Israel since Oct. 7 as well as humanitarian aid. The civilian carnage continues with Israel holding up humanitarian assistance, even bombing international aid volunteers and failing to disclose plans to the U.S. of how they will protect civilians in Rafah.

The war in Gaza is but one of the divisive issues boiling in the U.S. The Old Left is miserable that the causes in which we invested our lives and freedom have evaporated: Fair elections, universal suffrage, multicultural civil rights, gender and LGBTQIA+ rights, economic equality, abortion rights, equal pay, environmental sanity, child safety, hunger, homelessness, corporate responsibility. Young Americans now face rebuilding all that while coping with new disasters: a pandemic that shattered their social and educational worlds, a world literally on fire and in flood at the same time, dilapidated and outdated infrastructure, mass shootings in their schools. The challenges go on and on.

1968 was a particularly chaotic year. We lost Dr. King and Robert Kennedy to assassins. With the draft to supply Vietnam War cannon fodder, young men got college acceptances or draft notices with their high school diplomas. Anti-war protests and riots broke out across the country in the early spring. More followed after Dr. King’s assassination in nearly 100 American cities. Police shot and killed three students and wounded 28 others in Orangeburg, S.C., during a peaceful civil rights demonstration in February. Peaceful protestors across the country were frustrated that their words were falling on deaf ears. So some began to raise their voices and fists. 

LBJ, to his credit, saw the writing on the wall and stepped out of the race for a second full term. He bore the blame for ordering escalation of the war and he did not want to saddle Democrats with a compromised candidate at the top of the ticket. However, Democrats managed to compromise their ticket anyway by nominating Hubert Humphrey, who was less popular with younger Democrats then than Biden is today. 

As they will this year, Democrats held their national convention in Chicago in 1968. Leaders on the Left brought masses of peace freaks, Yippies, Hippies, Black Panthers, SCLC, SNCC and other grassroots groups to Chicago to convince DNC delegates to nominate Sen. Eugene McCarthy as the standard bearer for a peace and civil rights platform. The DNC would not listen. Boss Mayor Richard Dailey turned city police, the Ohio National Guard and other forces on the demonstrators camping in the park. 

The result was three days of what the National Commission on Causes and Prevention of Violence determined was a “police riot.” The nation was treated to television footage of tanks with barbed wire cages on front pushing demonstrators into the park. The scene was a near perfect replica of Russians advancing into Czechoslovakia at the same moment. Police in riot gear, wielding batons and tear gas, beat unarmed, peaceful kids in Grant Park who chanted, “The whole world’s watching! The whole world’s watching!” 

Humphrey lost. Richard Nixon won. The Democratic Party was weakened for decades. Evil and violent forces got emboldened. The past 25 years they have organized, strengthened, waiting underground in noisome alliances. Above ground, they’ve gained near insurmountable power in key states. They tested the surface with the Tea Party and blowing up the Murrah Building, then found their leader in 2010 or so. Jan. 6, 2021, they learned that nearly half the country would abide any conduct to gain power. We don’t even have to guess what they’ll do if the GOP leader wins the next election. He’s already told us: Autocracy on Day 1, removing or murdering his rivals, replacing our mutual government with his personal staff, changing all the rules of the game.

Liberal and leftist young people are protesting because the country’s leaders are not listening to them. They are frustrated. They do not want any part of killing children across the globe. They’re tired of their Constitutional rights being shredded. Democrats must give them a candidate they are excited to vote for. Last Wednesday, President Biden said all Americans have the right to be heard, but not create chaos. I wonder what he has actually heard from them. He has a vested interest in truly listening as does the Democratic Party.

A big difference between 1968 student demonstrators and activists today is these folks have the VOTE. That’s three years’ more young voters than in 1968, when the voting age was 21, not 18. That’s tens of millions more young people with enfranchisement. Give them a reason to use it enthuisiastically. They will save us. 

© Kathy Williams

May 3, 2024

Dedicated to our sister Roxy N. Melody Dorsey.

 

Killer Ds Jr.

Courage. Solidarity. Strategy. Tenacity. Patriotism. House Democrats forged those qualities into action Sunday night to kill giant voter suppression bill SB 7 in Texas’ 87th Legislature. But it was GOP hubris that held the door open for the Democrats’ walkout and the death of SB 7. The plan might be worth the title Killer Ds Jr., after a 2003 Democratic effort to stop a poor redistricting plan in its tracks earned that delegation the title “Killer Ds.” Republicans seemed giddy with power Sunday night, the last night of work scheduled for two years. They laughed and joked and paid little attention to serious discussions before them. Medicaid coverage for medically fragile children, fixing the electrical grid, responding to disasters and pandemics -- life-altering legislation got short shrift. House members talked on cell phones, played video games, chatted in little clusters, milled around the floor, took selfies. Speakers could barely be heard over the din.The GOP seemed confident its plan would work: Delay SB 7 late enough in the session to push Democrats backs against the wall and pass the bill in its most extreme form. Senators delivered a bill in the wee hours Sunday morning that would even allow an election to be overturned easily. As Sunday afternoon and evening wore on in the House chamber, Democrats lost request after request of the speaker. Republicans had delayed action on the bill so late in the session that Democrats faced stricter time limits on asking questions to learn what was in the bill. Speaker Dade Phelan granted GOP requests to suspend rules, to lay out previously unknown provisions and amendments after the deadline. The public and Democrats on committees in both the Senate and the House had no time or just a few hours to read new portions of bills. Hundreds of pages of rules and analysis, $36 million in new spending and the most sacred rights of our democracy were at stake in SB 7. All of this happened against a backdrop of racism. Rep. Nicole Collier, chair of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, was the only black member of the SB 7 Conference Committee that comprised three Democrats and seven Republicans. But the committee never conferred, according to CC Chairman Sen. Brian Hughes. Didn’t meet once. Democrats on the conference committee had zero involvement in shaping the most significant election bill in modern history. Hughes never said who actually put the final product together or knew what it contained. House and Senate committees that considered either HB 6 or SB 7 heard hours and hours of testimony on how much harder the bills’ suppression effect would be on voters of color. House Elections Committee chair Briscoe Cain demeaned Collier, refusing to grant her common legislative courtesy during a public hearing on HB 6. Later, during a lull in debate on the House floor May 6, Cain strode to Collier’s desk and invaded her personal space, poking his finger toward her face. He then walked to Rep. Senfronia Thompson’s desk and flailed wildly at her. Testimony in both the House and Senate revealed that those who drafted the bills did not confer with civil rights organizations representing communities of color, even though they are more heavily affected by the bill by far. Democrats’ scheme by farto defeat the bill in the regular session began to unfold Saturday evening, just after 10 p.m. Working on the schedule that the House had to pass the final version of the bill by midnight, Republican House leadership seemed confident it could enforce time limits to easily make the deadline. Democrats kept to their usual practice of challenging the facts, logic and effectiveness of the bill and filed points of order. Casually dropping notes and surreptitiously signaling one another, Democrats strolled around the floor and left unnoticed through different exits. Wrapped up in assuring Democrats would get no quarter with their motions and points of order, Republicans were in a scrum around the speaker’s desk, paying little attention to the movement. The last sound from Democrats was Collier screaming at Repubican Rep. Matt Krause, who had been following Democrats around all day taking pictures, “Stop harassing me!” Denied a quorum, the Republican-led House could not continue with its business and SB 7 died on the floor. It might rise again in special session, but for now it’s only a bad memory for Democrats. Democrats can now hope that Texans’ refusal to buckle under huge GOP-leaning odds to crush democracy will put starch in the spines of their federal counterparts. We must do whatever we can and some things we may not to preserve our sacred right to vote. Make good trouble. -- By Kathy Williams © 6/2/1921Kathryn L. Williams

Grayson County Burning

Copyright May 1, 1990 (klw) The day Grayson County burned by Kathy Williams On May 9, 1930, an angry mob became the law in Sherman The corner of Mulberry and Branch streets is still ugly -- a profusion of railroad tracks, ramshackle buildings and ragweed. Sixty-five years ago the intersection was the scene of Sherman's most horrifying and shameful episode. There the body of George Hughes was sexually mutilated, hung on a tree and burned in a bonfire. Two days earlier Hughes, a 41-year-old black man, had confessed to raping a white woman. The tragedy of May 9, 1930 extended far beyond the initial crimes. The enraged mob destroyed the thriving three-block black business district. The fuel to fire Hughes' funeral pyre was gathered from the ruins. Sherman's black community has never regained the wherewithal to rebuild. Except for restaurants and clubs, beauty shops and janitorial services, there are few black-owned businesses in Sherman today. Lawyer Charles Chatman is Sherman's only black professional in private practice. Dr. Wayne Bell, who works for Wilson N. Jones Hospital, is the only black physician. The Sherman Daily Democrat's 1930 account said, "Short work was made of the furnishings of the drug store and the kindling wood into which they were reduced was used for starting and keeping aglow the fire which mutely but forcefully evidenced the penalty the inexorable law of racial separation exacts on its violators." White residents also sustained heavy losses. Rioters burned and dynamited the Grayson County Court House. County officials and workers risked their lives to stave off the crowd. Gov. Dan Moody declared martial law. The Texas Rangers and the National Guard moved in to protect the city from looters and further mob violence. Even the London Times reported the horror in Sherman. The incident itself was not unusual. In May of 1930, three black men in North Texas and southern Oklahoma, charged with similar crimes, were killed by raving mobs. In each case, riotous whites whipped themselves into frenzies of destruction. They all inflicted post-mortem mayhem on their victims. What was different about the Sherman events was the quality of life the city's black community had built for itself. In 1930, most black businesses here were located in the two-story, brick Andrews Building in the 200 block of East Mulberry. The building was owned by a successful black farmer from Bells. A.J. Lawrence owned a grocery store. E.M. Barrier was a shoemaker. N.S. Everett & Brother was a transfer company. The Andrews Theater was next door to Walker & Tellie and J.A. Sims, tailors. Mrs. Hollie Robinson's Restaurant was down the way. Fraternal Funeral Home was in the Andrews Building as was a dance hall. J.D. Goodson had a drugstore downstairs from brother Samuel Goodson's doctor's office. Blanche Crowe put her dressmaker's shop next to R.L. Crowe's tailor shop. J.P. Hampton had his shoemaker shop in the same building as did J.E. Richardson. The Williams Hotel stood just across the street. Sherman's black community had its own Odd Fellows, Knights of Pythias and Masonic Lodge. Many black professionals made their ways to Sherman. Dr. R.L. Stinnet and another black dentist practiced here. A funeral home competed with Fraternal. Blacks practiced law and engineering in the town, There was also another black physician. Alexander Bate, a retired science teacher and coach, was 22 years old the night George Hughes body was dragged through East Sherman and burned. Bate and his wife Peaches live only three doors down from his family home on Montgomery Street. In 1930, he witnessed the tragedy from his roof top. The following is his account: "Oh yes, I saw it. They set that (Andrews Building) on fire. I got up on top of my house with a bucket of water. There were big old sparks raining down from the fire. Just about everybody in the 600 block of Montgomery left. They were just scared to death. "Now my mother had her leg amputated and she didn't have her wooden leg yet. We didn't have any transportation. My dad said, 'Son, we'll have to stay here.' He gave me the shotgun and I had only five shells for it. But he had a .32-20 pistol and a whole box of shells. "He walked from our house down to the Masonic Lodge and some old guys came out with 20 gallons of gas and were going to burn down Masonic Lodge. He drew down with that .32-20 and they got out of there so fast, I believe they broke just about every spring in that old car of theirs trying to get away from my papa. "Late that night, they were working on the Court House with dynamite, trying to get him (George Hughes) out of there. They drug him right down this street (Brockett.) It was the most disgusting thing I have ever seen. "There were two pregnant ladies, so big you'd have thought they were about to have those babies right then. They were right behind where they were dragging him. They were hopping up and down and squealing and laughing. The whole street was full of people. They all went down to the Union Station. "A lot of people kept hogs in town in those days and the black people went and hid in the hog pens for safety. The people were afraid. They went to stay with families in other towns and with the white people they worked for. I worked for the Marks brothers and they told me I could bring papa and mama out there to stay with them, but by then things were getting better so we stayed. "Then the governor, who was one of the most popular governors ever, sent in the troops and said don't shed no blood. They came and the rain came and everything cooled down." The crowd required a considerable amount of cooling down. Its temper had simmered for five days, fueled by newspaper accounts of the crimes. The event of Hughes' trial attracted a crowd of 5,000 people from all over North Texas and southern Oklahoma. Eventually Moody dispatched two Texas National Guard units and at least three Texas Rangers. Most people in the area learned of the crimes when they read their Sunday papers May 4, 1930. A banner headline said, "NEGRO HELD FOR ASSAULT NEAR LUELLA, White Woman Victim Alone in Farm Home, Bart Shipp Fired on Twice in Taking Negro." The story detailed the incident, including Hughes' apprehension. The newspaper erred in saying Hughes was under guard in the Grayson County Jail. That error drew the crowd that posted an increasingly rowdy vigil on the Court House lawn for five days. George Hughes was from Honey Grove in Fannin County. Before the assault, he had worked at several farms, including the place near Luella. The Sherman Daily Democrat, May 5, 1930, reported from the victim's statement, "(Hughes) had come to the house about 10 o'clock (a.m.) inquiring for her husband. He said he wanted to collect a sum of money he claimed to be owed him by her husband. Told that he was in Sherman, (Hughes) left. He returned shortly afterward with a double-barreled shotgun, finding the woman in the kitchen of the home. "Ordering her hands in the air (Hughes) forced her into a bedroom where the alleged assault occurred. Part of her clothing was torn off before she was overcome. Following the assault and with a piece of telephone or electric light cord, her hands were bound about her head and tied to a post of the bed. One foot also was tied to the post of the bed and the woman left in that position." Hughes fled the house, the account said. He went to a nearby barn to search for the woman's little boy who had run from the house shortly before Hughes entered. Two men neighbors walking along the road were alerted by the boy's and the woman's screams, the statement said. Hughes saw them coming and ran into a terraced field near Choctaw Creek. Hughes fired a shot at them, but missed. The woman succeeded in untying herself and ran to a neighbor's house. Hughes fired twice at Deputy Bart Shipp's car as he and another man chased the suspect across a field. The shot missed both men, but broke the windshield and sprayed the front seat between them. The suspect was disarmed and handcuffed without further problems. The next day's headlines promised swift justice. The complaint was filed Monday May 6 in a special session of the 15th state District Court. Four witnesses testified. The county attorney read the victim's statement and another from the suspect. The two accounts coincided. Hughes was charged with three counts of assault and two counts of attempted murder. The crowd outside the Court House grew. A white man who asked to remain anonymous described the scene on Friday morning May 9, 1930. "I was working in a drug store across the street from the Court House. Two Texas Rangers brought in a Negro. He had chains on his hands and legs. Both Rangers had rifles. They took him into the street and motioned him into the Court House. "He was to be tried that morning in the Court House on the southwest corner. There were so many people outside. Young people, 14, 15, 16. They came from Whitesboro, Gunter, Oklahoma, Whitewright, Pottsboro." The newspaper account said the trial began at 10 a.m., but only the first witness was able to testify. The crowd outside was more than noisy -- it was angry, violent and armed. "They started using dynamite," the drug store clerk said. "They came in to get something to drink like a soda water. They had a stick of dynamite in their hand. People I'd never seen before. Everything was going off, shotguns, dynamite, everything. They wanted to get this (black) fellow and hang him, that's what they wanted to do. "They (prosecutors) wanted to bring this woman in -- she was in the hospital -- that he had raped so she could identify him. They shouldn't have done that because that made everybody mad." The Sherman Daily Democrat said the woman did testify. She went to the Court House by ambulance and left the same way -- overcome by tear gas detonated by Texas Rangers to push back the now savage crowd. "The Court House had those big, open windows," The clerk said. "People would come in with these 10-gallon cans of gas and throw them into the window and onto the floor." Judge R.M. Carter, realizing the building was ablaze, ordered a change of venue "to prevent bloodshed." The judge, court officers, sheriff, deputies and Rangers found the stairway blocked by fire. Firefighters extended a ladder to the second floor and they escaped. Although accounts vary, Hughes evidently was offered the choice of staying in a sealed steel vault or climbing down the ladder to the waiting mob. He decided to stay and was locked in the room with a bucket of water. "That was about 5 p.m.," the drug store clerk said. "The wall had fallen down and had cooled off enough. A man came up with a welding truck and carried a torch up the ladder and cut down through the lock. We walked up there and said "Hey I got him!'" Some reports from the time say Hughes was alive when he was pulled from the vault. Others say he suffocated from the intense heat of the fireproof room. The most credible accounts said Hughes died when shrapnel from the dynamited vault struck him in the head. Judge R.C. Vaughan, retired from the 15th state District Court, was 14 and in the ninth grade in Denison at the time of the events. "A friend of mine and I actually slipped off in my parents' car to come to Sherman," Vaughan said. "The Court House was pretty much burned then. We managed to get even with the east entrance on Travis Street. The steel vault's shell was apparently intact. "Someone climbed up and put goggles on and torched the vault. Then an explosion blew a hole in something. The man on the ladder got this defendant's body out and threw it down the ladder. I could see movement in a group of men to the north and west. I was aware that a car was going east on Houston Street. I can't say I saw the body, but people were following the car. We followed the mob on Mulberry. They strung his body on a tree and lit a bonfire. I think I could feel heat and hear flesh sizzle. Someone hollered 'Police' and we broke and ran." Many of the people in that crowd were young boys. What seemed to horrify people all over the world who read accounts was that women, some pregnant, some holding small children, stood at the scene and urged the men on to greater violence. Most accounts say that no local people were involved. Of the 39 men eventually arrested for the riot, arson and attempted murder, 18 were from Sherman. Fourteen were indicted but newspapers of the time have been robbed of information about where those indicted lived. The only editions on file at the Sherman Democrat were mutilated long ago. William Hill also lived in Sherman at the time of the tragedy. "I don't know why we never built it (the black business district) back up," Hill said. "I kind of think some of the people never felt like putting their money back into it. I guess that they were scared that the climate was so bad and they could lose it all again. Andrews was probably the most qualified to rebuild, but he was killed two years before. His family just never seemed interested." Hill said the gap in services was filled by white practitioners. "Many went to the white doctors and dentists," Hill said. “You could shop in grocery stores and clothing stores as long as you had money. There never was any discrimination in spending money." An accomplishment in Sherman years later helped heal many wounds. Because of cooperation among white and black leaders, the city became integrated with few angry and no violent scenes. "I worked with a group to get job opportunities for black people in Sherman," said Bate. "The first group came from Austin College. Dr. Kline, Dr. Frank Edwards and his wife Melva, Dean Nusbaum. They organized a group at AC with me and my wife and William Hill, with Rev. McGruder and his wife and P.W. Neblett and his wife." The group met for covered dish dinners and would rotate as hosts. Later the city, under mayors Josh Stephens' and Herman Baker's leadership would form similar groups. They met with law enforcement officials. They were invited to morning coffee klatches with the white businessmen in "whites only" restaurants. Sherman lawyer David Brown set the pace for desegregating hiring practices and lunch bars in Sherman businesses. When Brown discovered Bates' Fred Douglass football team couldn't use the Bearcat Stadium field house and locker room, he ended the practice with one phone call. "But Charlie Spears (late president of Grayson County State Bank) made the giant step," Bate said. "We had never been in a position before to get the experience and qualifications we needed. He took a janitor and sent him to Grayson County College and made him a teller. We had never had the opportunity before. Whenever a teacher was in need of $75 or $100, he never turned them down, he just trusted us." In 1984, Sherman formed a chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. One of its goals now is to help the black community thrive. To move toward that goal, the organization awards scholarships to promising young students. It recognizes those who have made significant contributions. Bate, while talking of the 1930 tragedy, lamented the loss of the black business district. Sherman's black community, he said, was just never the same. However, he added, although blacks lost a lot at the hands of an angry white mob, many other whites extended their hands in genuine friendship.

Open Letter to Sens. John Cornyn and Ted Cruz

Dec. 30, 2019

Dear Senators:

It’s time to stand up for America. It’s time to be a patriot. It’s time to do the job we elected you to do. It’s time to obey the oath you swore to the Constitution.

Only you and the other 98 members of the Senate can save this nation. It might well be the most perilous moment in our history. An amoral, and possibly insane, president has perverted our government. He has exhorted elements of our society to attend to their worst, most violent and self-interested instincts. Inept, and at times corrupt, elements of the media propelled him to power and continue false narratives to keep him there. Personal and corporate greed fueled his rise. They have installed all the elements needed for a totalitarian takeover of our democracy. Members of Congress including you, who value power of office and re-election above all else, have perverted our government. You have become a sycophant branch, parroting his every lie and minimizing his every traitorous act.

Some Senators, including you Sen. Cornyn, have said you don’t need to hear evidence from witnesses or see documents relevant to the articles of impeachment. We do. We deserve to know the full extent of what has been done in our name and with our treasure. Few Republican Senators have shown any indication they will obey the oath they must take to sit as jurors in the impeachment trial. Please do not perjure yourself. That betrays the Constitution and is a crime against the nation and our people.

There is time to save the United States of America. You have a chance to redeem yourself. New, incriminating facts come to light every day. Seize that as a reason to change your mind to allow a fair process in the president’s trial. Read Matthew 6:6 and do the right thing.

Your Constituent,

Kathy Williams

Leter to Rep. Michael McCaul on articles of impeachment 11.22.2019

Note: This is a letter to my Congressional representative sent 11.22.2019, and not a traditional blog post.

Dear Rep.Michael McCaul:

I have watched every minute of the U. S. House impeachment investigation hearings, some of it several times. I have taken notes and compared earlier testimony and later testimony, one witness in context with another. I have listened to opening and closing statements by Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and Ranking Member Devin Nunes. I have listened carefully to each round of questioning. I considered all this information in the context of being equivalent to a grand jury investigation, not as a trial.

It is my fervent prayer that you have done the same. I believe that as ranking member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and representative of a large and varied district in Texas, that was your duty. I see in your biography that you are a parent, and I assume you are as I am, a grandparent. Your duty to their future is at least as great as your duty to your current constituents. Your duty to both of those and to your oath to faithfully defend the Constitution is far, FAR greater than to any political party.

My conclusion, after such extensive due diligence, is that there is more than enough evidence to charge the president with at least three high crimes and misdemeanors: Bribery (in the Constitutional sense), abuse of power in attempting to corrupt our election process with foreign interference; and obstruction or contempt of Congress. There also may be more charges arising from the other committees and from Robert Mueller’s investigation that should be included in the Articles of Impeachment. As your constituent, I ask you to vote in favor of adopting these Articles of Impeachment and send them to the Senate for trial.

What played out before the nation over the last two weeks concerns me greatly. The nastiness and casual regard for the truth displayed, particularly by representatives Nunes and Jordan, and at times my former representative John Ratcliffe, horrified me. While issues of Joe and Hunter Biden and Burisma might be legitimate fodder for further investigation, they have absolutely NOTHING to do with the president’s guilt or innocence of the charges I have stated. And any such investigation should be performed by the U.S. justice system, not a foreign country. Please show the sophistication of thought I believe you as a lawyer are capable and separate these red herrings from the very real Constitutional issues currently before the U.S. House of Representatives.

Respectfully,

Kathy Williams

Dear Democrats and other Thinking Americans

     Let's be crystal clear. Our collective future depends on an understanding of two concepts.
     First: Two factors threaten our survival as a democratic nation. One, a movement now flourishes that calls itself “Christian” and wishes to establish a sharia-like law, based on corrupt interpretation of the Christian Bible. Two, an oligarchy supports the mission of these freaks of the far right because they serve as an effective distraction to the oligarchs' real purpose: To complete their full control over our economy and political process. Second: The only action that can prevent the subjugation of democracy to religious crazies and corporate control are to elect either Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton.

     For all that you hold dear, please realize that the vital debate that must now happen to determine our presidential nominee must never devolve into ugliness, vitriol and name calling. This is just the distraction neo-Republicans need to hide the terrifying reality that all their candidates, even those whose smiles aren't creepy, are far to the right of 90-95 percent of us. Not one GOP candidate holds values common even among most Republicans. But if our political discourse becomes one, loud hate and fear filled shouting match, those really evil guys sound more mainstream. So tone it down. Employ the Golden Rule. Check out what you write before you post it.

     This takeover of all that we hold dear has been happening for decades. But the process is intensifying and nearing completion. This fact puts us simultaneously in the most danger ever to lose our country to the forces of fear, hatred and corruption and in position to grab our greatest opportunity to reclaim it as a powerful tool to achieve common good and a bright future for us all. 

     In the past week, two events starkly demonstrate what is at stake. A strip mall preacher defined some of what “Christian” sharia law might include. The Southern Poverty Law Center did not declare the Republican Party a hate group as some media outlets have. However, it cited in its annual report “Year in Hate and Extremism” racist rants and hate speech aimed at inflaming violent extremists from every remaining Republican presidential candidate. That second point is the more important, but let's start with the the preacher because it demonstrates the set up that blocks us from seeing the stark, immoral behavior of the neo-GOP.

     In Tempe, Arizona, Baptist preacher Steven L. Anderson declared from the pulpit, “What do you think they mean by women’s rights? You know what they mean? The right to divorce your husband is what they mean. ...The right to rebel and disobey your husband, the right to divorce him, the right to go out and get a job and make your own money, the right to tell him what to do, the right to go vote for our leaders as if women should have any say in how our country is run, when the Bible says that “I suffer not a woman to teach, not to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence”?

This same man has prayed for President Obama's assassination, for the death penalty for all gay people. He's pretty effective, it seems one of his congregation showed up at an Obama rally with an AR-15 and a handgun.

     And of course it's not this one guy. In the same month, similar, softer expressions came from a female panelist on “The View”; a guy in England scheduled a series of events in America aimed at legalizing rape. So when we hear this din, we tend to be less shocked, less inclined to act against news like Gov. Abbott vowing to continue investigating Planned Parenthood. We might miss deeper assaults on access to birth control and health care; the right to vote; renewed attacks on the environments; ability to earn a fair and living wage. That's why we need to stop shouting at each other, so we can hear the deadly plotting whispers uttered daily.

     That's also why the SPLC's condemnation of neo-GOP presidential contenders for their role in escalating violence becomes the most important news of the year. SPLC has, since 1971, studied, reported and fought against extremism and hatred. It worships no sacred cows and will call out any entity of any race or persuasion who threatens another with harm. They are brave, bold and largely unshockable. When SPLC says pay attention, that this is quantitatively and qualitatively different, we better pay attention.

     After remarking on a year of extraordinary violence from domestic extremists and a 14-percent increase in radical, right-wing hate groups, SPLC wrote, “The armed violence was accompanied by rabid and often racist denunciations of Muslims, LGBT activists and others — incendiary rhetoric led by a number of mainstream political figures and amplified by a lowing herd of their enablers in the right-wing media.”

     While the most odious culprit was, of course, Donald Trump, SPLC listed each current GOP candidate as either espousing violence and discrimination against ethnic, political or religious entities or promoting others within their own organizations who do so.

     We are faced then with the scariest threats to the safe and peaceful conduct of our lives since at least 1968. And it is into this turmoil that the oligarchs advance to vanquish our remaining ability as a democracy to protect ourselves from their greed and power. Since the 1980s, Congress and presidents have removed almost every protection for individuals, as well as small and mediums sized businesses from corporate overreach. Those, in some cases, have been replaced with new, but much less potent laws (for example, Glass-Steagall with Dodd-Frank). The Supreme Court has defined corporations as persons and money as speech, perverting the basic documents of our democracy. Reaganomics has trickled down to drown our middle and lower income families in debt and poverty. NAFTA and CAFTA and other trade agreements have sent our jobs overseas and strengthened grinding poverty in third world countries leaving our desperately poor neighbors to cross our borders for survival funds. You know the litany.

     The only solution, then, is to win this election. And to win it big. Up and down the ballot, as far as we can go. Every race from State Board of Education and district judges to the Texas Supreme Court, Railroad Commission and every single member of Congress we can eek out. Shock and awe at the ballot box.

     For either Bernie or Hillary to be effective once in office will require us to create the political revolution that Bernie has been talking about since the beginning. WE are the people who still believe we, and not mega-wealthy private interests or corrupt clerics, should control our government and personal destinies. The political revolution means we show up at the polls in amazing numbers. It means we start being involved now with demanding (firmly but politely) the Democratic National Committee stop taking lobbyists' money, as President Obama asked. The political revolution means committing to finding the money to replace that (and volunteering lots and lots of time to make up for any shortfall.) More than all of that, it means saying to our elected officials at all levels, “Have spine. Have the courage of your convictions. Live up to your promises. Listen to me because my voice is what matters. Use my money to make a difference in people's lives; in my life. Invest in the American future.” Political revolution means holding our elected officials responsible every day and supporting them every day.

     Only two candidates can fend off the oligarchs in the short run and the racists, misogynists, hate mongers at our door today. However, only Bernie Sanders offers a way to a long-term solution, a more perfect democracy, because Secretary Clinton is too much a part of the system that holds the oligarchy, the corporatist world in place. If she is nominated, vote for Hillary as a place saver for someone who can truly bring about a political revolution in the years to come. I will advocate ceaselessly for polite and intelligent political dialogue in the nomination process. And I will work like a dog, a yellow dog, to get every Democratic candidate elected in 2016. Please join me.